Sunday, November 7, 2010

The New American Century - PNAC Exposed | Global Empire |Axisoflogic.com

The New American Century - PNAC Exposed ( 0)
Printer friendly page Print This ShareThis
By Massimo Mazzucco. NAC.
New American Century
Sunday, Oct 31, 2010

This film goes in detail through the untold history of The Project for the New American Century with tons of archival footage and connects it right into the present. This film exposes how every major war in US history was based on a complete fraud with video of insiders themselves admitting it. This film shows how the first film theaters in the US were used over a hundred years ago to broadcast propaganda to rile the American people into the Spanish-American War.

This film shows the white papers of the oil company Unocal which called for the creation of a pipeline through Afghanistan and how their exact needs were fulfilled through the US invasion of Afghanistan. This film shows how Halliburton under their "cost plus" exclusive contract with the US Government went on a mad dash spending spree akin to something out of the movie Brewster's Millions, yet instead of blowing $30 million they blew through BILLIONS by literally burning millions of dollars worth of hundred thousand dollar cars and trucks if they had so much as a flat tire.

"A stunning film. It should be seen as widely as possible, in cinemas, bars, clubs, at meetings and, of course, through the internet. I'm sure the film will continue to be a source of debate and political education for many years. Maybe until the war criminals have been brought to trial."

 - Ken Loach

While Massimo Mazzucco’s first political documentary, GLOBAL DECEIT (2006), focused on the long list of inconsistencies in the official version of the 9/11 attacks, THE NEW AMERICAN CENTURY explores the historical, philosophical and economic background that suggests a matrix for such events that is much closer to home than the so-called "Islamic terrorism". The film provides solid evidence for the true reasons behind the Afghanistan and Iraq wars, whose unfolding is described in chilling detail in a document called "Project for the New American Century", published in the year 2,000, that seems to have served as the actual blueprint for such dramatic events.

Editor's Note: We offer this video in two forms. The first appears below in 10 clips from the film documentary. This may appeal to those of you who don't have time to sit down and watch a 2 hour movie, but may want to return to it in the form of 10 portions that are compatible with your schedule. For those of you who want to view it in one documentary uninterrupted, we provide it intact below these 10 segments. However you view this video, we think most Axis readers will find it to be worth the time required to watch it. The film makes a strong case for the "blood for oil" and world dominance motives of the PNAC for the US wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. In our judgement, the only weakness in the documentary is that it omits the important role Israel and Zionism plays in drawing the U.S. into these wars.

- Les Blough, Editor

Part One of Ten

Part Two of Ten

Part Three of Ten

Part Four of Ten

Part Five of Ten

Part Six of Ten

Part Seven of Ten

Part Eight of Ten

Part Nine of Ten

Part Ten of Ten

The New American Century - PNAC Exposed
Full Length in a Single Film Documentary

 

Posted via email from moneytalks's posterous

War is a Racket by Smedley Butler

Saturday, November 6, 2010

Scientist John Hutchison Uses Frequency Healing to Restore The Gulf After BP Oil Spill

Column - Why you may soon need a warmist’s permission to eat | Herald Sun Andrew Bolt Blog

Column - Why you may soon need a warmist’s permission to eat

Andrew Bolt

Wednesday, November 03, 2010 at 06:37am

image

SO you think I exaggerate when I say global warming is just the latest cause of the closet totalitarian?

Then pay close attention to an experiment the warmists are about to inflict on the people of Norfolk Island.

Be warned. What’s being trialled there with $390,000 of Gillard Government money may, if it works, be spread to the mainland, say the researchers.

Which means it’s coming for you.

The plan - and, no, I’m not joking - is to put Norfolk Islanders on rations to fight both global warming and obesity.

Funded by the Australian Research Council, and approved by the Socialist Left Science Minister Kim Carr, researchers from the Southern Cross University will give each volunteer on the island a “carbon card”.

Every time they buy petrol, electricity or an air flight, they will have “carbon units” deducted from the fixed allowance on their card.

More units will be lost each time they buy fatty foods, or produce flown in from a long way away.

If, at the end of each year or so, they have carbon units left over, they can sell them. If they’ve blown their allocation, they must buy more.

But each year, the number of carbon units in this market will be cut, causing their price to soar - and thus the price of extra food, power and petrol to rise - because the idea is to cut greenhouse gases and make Norfolk Islanders trim, taut and terrifically moral.

Conservatives well aware of human fallibility will immediately spot the obvious flaw in this latest scheme of the Left to remake humanity.

It’s this: what happens when people run out of their carbon rations, and can’t afford the extra units they need to buy more fuel, power or even food?

This is precisely what I put this week to Garry Egger, head of this experiment and professor of Lifestyle Medicine and Applied Health Promotion at SCU. 

His response was astonishing and revealing, because this basic question - which so exposes the teeth of the totalitarian - would have been one you’d think he’d long wrestled with.

After all, his personal carbon trading idea is not new, so much does it appeal to the fingerwaggers and bullies infesting the global warming faith.

As far back as 2006, Britain’s then environmental minister, David Miliband, proposed a similar scheme, since endorsed by the Environment Agency and House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee, which even insisted the Government defy howls of protest from mere voters.

“Widespread public acceptance, while desirable, should not be a pre-condition for a personal carbon trading scheme; the need to reduce emissions is simply too urgent,” the MPs said, before being driven off to dinner.

(Or as our own Professor Clive Hamilton, author and former Greens candidate, puts it, global warming is so “horrible” that leaders must look to “canvassing of emergency responses such as the suspension of democratic processes”.)

Nor is Egger’s idea new in Australia, The farcical “ideas summit” of prime minister Kevin Rudd’s 1000 “best and brightest” Australians also recommended it - which is a very good reason to be alert and alarmed.

“We have the technology now to create a ‘carbon account’ for individuals,” says the summit’s report, in between appeals for chairbound workers to be given 30 minutes a day of exercise and stairs to climb at work.

Yet although carbon rationing plans have been kicked around for years by the Left, that key question of the conservative has still not been answered. As in: what if people don’t want to live your dream? What if they rebel, or merely fail you?

Let’s go to the transcript of my interview with Egger on MTR 1377 this week, to see how he answered.

Me: What happens to those people who overdraw their carbon emissions ...

Egger: In the first year you are just warned ... (Later) if you overspend, you’ve got to buy the units that are cashed in ...

Me: If you put this in on the mainland and you were really strict about it - you really thought the world was warming very, very dangerously and someone exceeded their rations of these carbon units - one would presume that you would make food, for example, too expensive for them to buy.

Egger: That’s right ... so if you’ve got, for example, a very fatty unhealthy food that is imported from overseas which takes a lot of carbon to develop it, then the price would go up ...

Me: What happens to a very fat family, a very irresponsibly fat family, and they’ve blown their carbon budget to the scheissenhausen and you’ve made their food terribly expensive? What about the kids? They go to breakfast and they’ve got one baked bean?

Egger: In general you’ll find that in a very fat family they are low-income earners ... so those people would actually benefit from a scheme like this because the food that they buy, the energy that they use, they don’t use as much energy as the rich anyway ...

Me: But what happens? Their ration of carbon credits runs out and you’ve made food too expensive for them to buy. What happens to them?

Egger: Again, they get money back from doing the right thing.

Me: No, but they’ve done the wrong thing. That’s why they are fat and poor. They’ve done the wrong thing, they’ve run out of their carbon credits. What are you going to do to them then, when the food’s too expensive to buy?

Egger: There are going to be personal cases like this that need to be worked out and they need to be worked out in the tax system as well as in the carbon credits system.

Egger, founder of GutBusters, undoubtedly means to do good. He has no wish to see children starve.

YET I think we have here an insight into a key failing of so many grand schemes of the Left to improve resistant humans or build for them someone else’s idea of the perfect society.

These schemes so often are too perfect for the flawed humans they supposedly serve. But it’s the humans who must then adapt to the system, and not the other way around. Which is where some force is required; some democracy sacrificed.

What a buzz for the closet totalitarian then, to bully other people “for their

own good” - in this case, to “save the planet”.

When the cause is so just, which planet-saver could let some contemptible fatty stand in their way, begging for the carbon credits to feed their chubby children?

On the other hand, which planet-saver would deny themselves any aid or comfort in this great struggle?

Need an illustration of what I’m talking about? Egger himself plans to jet off to Mexico next month to boast to a United Nations global warming conference how he persuaded Norfolk Islanders to ration just such joy flights for themselves.

This is your future coming right at you, folks. Best you realise it’s no longer a joke.

(Thanks to reader Burchell for the picture, taken at a San Diego restaurant.)

Posted via email from moneytalks's posterous

Zap of electricity makes you a brighter spark - Telegraph

Zap of electricity makes you a brighter spark

Pulsing an electrical current through your brain can boost your ability to do sums for up to six months, scientists have discovered.

British-based researchers have found that passing a low current through a specific brain region can double your ability to do mathematics.

They believe in future the technique may help people with dyscalculia, or "number blindness" – the mathematical equivalent of dyslexia.

But it is important to get the wiring right. If the electricity flows in the wrong direction it has the opposite effect, creating a person with a poor head for figures.

The same team of Oxford University scientists previously showed that temporary dyscalculia could be induced with electrical brain stimulation.

In the new study, 15 student volunteers aged 20 and 21 were given a series of standard tests designed to assess numerical skills.

The participants were timed to see how quickly and accurately they could solve mathematical puzzles involving symbols representing numerical values.

During the tests, a one milliamp current was passed across the parietal lobes of two groups of students, while a third group received a "fake" stimulus.

The parietal lobe is a brain region that plays a crucial role in mathematical processing.

In one of the stimulated groups, the current flow was from the right to the left parietal lobe, while in the other the direction was reversed.

Volunteers who received the right-left stimulus reached double the level of performance in the tests compared to the non-stimulated group after just a few sessions, the scientists reported in the journal Current Biology.

In contrast, those stimulated with a left-right current saw their performance drop to about the same level as six-year-old children.

Students who received a fake "placebo" stimulus had results that fell half way between those of the other two groups.

Dr Cohen Kadosh, from Oxford University's Department of Experimental Psychology, who led the research, said: "We are not advising people to go around giving themselves electric shocks, but we are extremely excited by the potential of our findings and are now looking into the underlying brain changes.

"We've shown before that we can induce dyscalculia, and now it seems we might be able to make someone better at maths, so we really want to see if we can help people with dyscalculia, with a possible benefit to the general public.

"Electrical stimulation is unlikely to turn you into the next Einstein, but if we're lucky it might be able to help some people cope better with maths."

The study is part of a large-scale project funded by the Wellcome Trust charity aimed at helping people with learning difficulties get better at maths.

One test, the Stroop test, creates counter-intuitive problems. Often it employs colours, where, for instance, the word red is written in green ink. Here, larger values were shown as smaller images and vice versa.

Another task involved a mapping test where an image representing a value had to be correctly positioned between two others. In the same way, the number five is placed half way between a one and 9 on a line.

Commenting on the research, Dr Christopher Chambers, from the School of Psychology, University of Cardiff, said: "This is a really intriguing finding, showing that brain stimulation can boost numerosity skills, enhancing the ability to learn the link between arbitrary symbols and numbers, and then processing the symbols as though they actually are numbers.

"The findings add to a growing body of research showing that certain types of brain stimulation, in certain contexts, can enhance brain function.

"One obvious implication for these findings lies in the development of methods for enhancing numerical skills in the general population, even for those who are not clinically impaired. Brain stimulation methods ... also have a lot of potential applications in promoting recovery following brain injury or developmental disorders."

Posted via email from moneytalks's posterous

Friday, November 5, 2010

The Ninth Wave - Agenda 21

The Ninth Wave - Agenda 21
From Jim Kirwan
11-4-10
 
 
'In order to save the world we must first of all destroy the world, in order to remake our world in a sustainable way.'
 
AGENDA 21
A partial transcript of the 9 minute video
 
"Agenda 21 is the 1992 United Nations real declaration on the environment and development. It is the agenda for the twenty-first century for a 'Brave New World' where everything that you've cherished and held true will no longer exist.
 
Agenda 21 defines itself as 'the comprehensive plan of action' to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the United Nations systems. It also elevates nature above man and it contains something called the Precautionary Principle ­ where basically you're guilty until proven innocent. Sustainable Development is the philosophy designed to bring human beings across the globe under the full control of a narrow human-elite. It's a forty chapter document to basically control the world. It's based entirely on social control mechanisms." (This was what George H. W. Bush had in mind when he introduced the need for a New World Order on September 11, 1990) (1)
 
"Sustainable Developers have designed a global movement coordinated through a global action plan to create world government in accordance with certain objectives. These objectives include an end to national sovereignty, the abolition of private property, the restructure of the family unit, and increasing limitations and restrictions on mobility and individual opportunity.
 
The 'Green Goal' includes the listings of 'what is not sustainable.' A couple examples include: Private property! Seven twenty-eight lists fossil fuels. Golf courses and ski-lodges are not (sustainable). Irrigation is not-sustainable. Paved roads; Consumerism agriculture, herbicides, pesticides; elsewhere it lists farmland, pastures, grazing of livestock and the family unit. The focus of sustainable development is the abolition of private property; societal undermining of the family and abandonment of the constitutional protection of unalienable rights as established in the Declaration of Independence.
 
In the 1990's . . . mother-earth's surface wasn't to be scratched. Human beings were to be concentrated into human settlement zones. Educational systems were to focus on the environment as the central organizing principle ­ all aspects of life were covered.
 
I went to these committees at the request of some people who told me that I needed to understand what was going on and I came back and I said ' This is craziness, this is so silly it has no chance of having any effect on our society.' Well I was wrong.
 
The United States' government support for the sustainable development Agenda 21 is very clear: In 1992 while the real conference was going on, George Bush then president, was there ­ where he executed the Agenda and the 21 protocols on behalf of the United States, and brought it back to Washington D.C. Within a year Bill Clinton, BY EXECUTIVE ORDER, no congressional review, established The President's Counsel for 'Sustainable Development.'
 
In Santa Cruz we've got a two lane freeway system, we need four but what we're getting is hundreds of millions of dollars in federal money to dig a dilapidated rail line that Southern Pacific wants to put in the hands of somebody else; so that a commuter line can be built along the railroad-track that will be followed by fourteen story buildings where people will live in 'stack-em and pack-em units where developers ­ sop called 'sustainable developers' will be these highrises with federal dollars. In fact Santa Cruz has received a 300 million dollar federal grant to build the first three thousand of these stack & pack units. The county Board of Supervisors said that 'If you're a sustainable developer then you're immune from any construction 'defect liability.' It's a partnership (private) between selected developers building this New World Order and using tax-payer dollars in order to do it.
 
 
 
 
This is a map of the Wildlands Project. To explain the map the red are to be off-limits to human beings. No resource development, no human activity. If you live there ­ you won't! The yellow areas are the areas for major control of all human activity. If you live there ­ you won't.
 
The black dots are the 'smart-growth zones' where human beings are to be stacked and packed in small living-units along rail tracks. The smart-growth program also has jobs-assigned and children-cared-for by the state.
 
The question has been asked many times 'How the people that plan to perpetrate this will make it last, and the answer to that is that you steal a generation of children and you indoctrinate them so that they accept these ideas and they become 'Global Citizens' in the coming 'Global Village.'
 
UNESCO came out and declared 2005 and 2015 - The Decade for Education for 'Sustainable Development.' But they go on to say that it will encompass the forty-chapters of Agenda Twenty-One: And that is your federal national curriculum. The entire purpose of second grade social studies is to transfer loyalty form the family to the government; and to teach them about sustainable economic consumption. Students construct their own understandings of 'reality' and realize that objective reality is 'not knowable' so 'why bother.' The truth is the truth which keeps men free is being suppressed in order to prop up our new attitude training Agenda.
 
And it moves on: This is our new math ­ they call it connected mathematics. Standard 3 tells us that mathematics is 'man-made' ­ that it is arbitrary and good solutions are arrived at by consensus! Most of us assume that 2+2 is always going to equal 4 ­ You're wrong we might reach a new consensus (2+2=5). How well does it work: Well they tell ya. In the teacher's guide in the back they tell ya that because the curriculum doesn't emphasize arithmetic computations done by hand, some students may not do as well on tests assessing computational skills. 'We believe such a trade-off in the favor of CMP is very much to the student's advantage, in the world of work.'
 
Our children are mathematically illiterate on purpose! How do I know on purpose? Why isn't this just a basic bad-idea? Because the Sustainable Development plan tells us so! 'Generally more highly educated people who have higher incomes can consume more resources, than poorly educated people who tend to have lower incomes. In this case more education increases the threat to sustainability.'
 
I did not believe for the longest time it was a deliberate policy the dumbing down: I thought the dumbing down was a natural consequence of a bad idea. Folks it's deliberate ­ it's DELIBERATE!
 
The Sustainable Globalist-Goal is the orchestration of a planned fall of American principles, values and lifestyles. The effect on the average American will be devastating. With modernizing technology the ordinary person will live without independence, privacy, or substantive rights.
 
Another press-conference I attended was the ICLEI Group, the International Committee for Local Environmental Initiatives that helps in the implementation of Agenda 21 ­ in all of our local communities. One of the speakers was a Harvey Rubin, the vice-chair of ICLEI, and I asked him about the correlative rights of Americans that Americans derive from the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights ­ your individual liberties, your private property, your freedom of speech ­ I asked about it clashing with Agenda 21 an you know what his response was! 'Individual rights must take a back-seat to THE COLLECTIVE." End of the transcription.
 
This garage has been part of a century's long war in which various criminal elements have always struggled for thousands of years to steal from everyone else the fruits of their own labor, and the right to determine what their own lives should be all about. Agenda 21 needs to be forcefully denied!
 
"There are two great powers that have been fighting since time began. Every advance in human life, every scrap of knowledge and wisdom and decency we have has been torn by one side from the teeth of the other. Every little increase in human freedom has been fought over furiously between those who want us to know and those who want us to obey and to be humble and to submit." Taken from The Golden Compass Pg. 283, by Philip Pullman ­ from the first book of his trilogy: Dark Materials"
 
If the people of the world do not firmly reject Agenda 21 and all of its blatantly criminal assertions, then we shall no longer have that "Universe" that supposedly we are all a part of.
 
Watch the video and spread this far and wide ­ please!
 
kirwanstudios@sbcglobl;.net
 
1) Toward a New World Order
http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/war/bushsr.htm
 
Agenda 21 For Dummies

Posted via email from moneytalks's posterous