Saturday, April 2, 2011

The new eugenics: Life in our vast chemical vats « The PPJ Gazette

The new eugenics: Life in our vast chemical vats

Marti Oakley (c) copyright 2011 All Rights Reserved

______________________________________________

“Utilizing scientific technique in biology, only millionaires would be served real meat; everyone else would eat synthetic beefsteaks.  In the main, food would be manufactured in “vast chemical factories”.  [pp.167-169]  Bertrand Russell The Scientific Outlook (1931 ”

______________________________________________

As far back as the late 1800’s, maybe even earlier, has been a concerted effort by collections of individuals who somehow view themselves as superior  to the general population to institute eugenics; a system of  controlled breeding of those they viewed as inferior.  The American Eugenics Society formed the blueprint for what was later used in Nazi Germany to systematically purge Europe of those they found undesirable based on race, intellectual capacity, infirmities, social rejections, physical traits and even age.  We’ve come a long way, baby.  

Eugenics has been transformed, re-created, re-packaged and has a shiny new image signified by the systematic poisoning of the world’s populations through the use of chemicals, vaccines, lethal medications, chemtrails and efforts to genetically alter food to achieve a soft kill.  In order to make this selective genetic machine operate efficiently, global efforts are being implemented to collect the DNA of every human being on earth.  It is our DNA that must be altered, rendered inefficient and damaged, allowing the manipulation and exploitation coveted by the scientific industrialists. 

“Utilizing scientific technique in biology, only millionaires would be served real meat; everyone else would eat synthetic beefsteaks.  In the main, food would be manufactured in “vast chemical factories”.  [pp.167-169]  Bertrand Russell The Scientific Outlook (1931 

Is this not where we are now?  The food in our stores is irradiated, contaminated with gmo’s, loaded with chemicals, preservatives, dyes, residual pesticides, herbicides, residual vaccines, hormones, antibiotics and foods created from combining the genes of unrelated species and from cloning.  Our food supply, so infected with toxins of all kinds produced for no other reason than to manipulate ownership of the food supply for profit by bio-pirates, now presents a threat to the health of human beings and poses immediate danger to the environment.   

We don’t know what we are eating and most likely if we saw the contents and processes used to create these frankenfoods, we would be horrified.  Processed foods, and I use the term “food” lightly, lining the shelves of our grocery stores have little actual food in them.  A reading of a simple label on a box will leave you dazed and confused. Chemicals, dyes, artificial sweeteners, artificial flavorings, preservatives and that little add-on….”other spices”.  Other spices is one, or a combination of, chemical(s), all intended to make the chemically and genetically altered mush that will eventually be reshaped by machine to resemble some food you might recognize, taste like it might really be “food”. 

In 1952, Bertrand Russell penned his book The Impact of Science on Society where he speculated about the very probable goal of eugenics as performed by government when science was elevated to a level where it could engineer society.  

“Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible. Even if all are miserable, all will believe themselves happy, because the government will tell them they are so.” [pp 66]  

One need only look at the growing list of mandated vaccines foisted on infants and toddlers, and the growing efforts to con the adult population into taking vaccines of one kind or another, many of which have never been proven safe or even effective to know that whatever is in these toxic concoctions is not necessarily good for you.  The efforts by pharmaceutical companies along with the CDC to marginalize or minimally report adverse reactions is in direct correlation to the rising number of individuals suffering from adverse reactions, sometimes even death from the vaccines.  

Autism now strikes 1 in every 110 children.  Neurological disorders, learning disabilities, physical impairments and death can result from the use of forced vaccinations of infants and toddlers whose immune systems are not able to counter the massive injection of toxins contained in the chemical stews loaded into needles.  The general concept delivered to the public is, if a “few” children have to die or live permanently injured as a result of a vaccine, this is simply collateral damage; for the greater good, national security or some other jingoistic nonsense.  A very cavalier response as long as it isn’t their child who was injured or who died.  And who determines what number a “few” might be? In comparison to what? 

Outbreaks of measles and other childhood diseases are treated as if the black plague had resurfaced.  Announcements of 50, or 100 children in an wide area with cases of measles seems to put the CDC and World Health (Homicide) Organization into a tailspin.  It is catastrophic! Terrible!  Frightening!  Yet both these organizations work in tandem to hide, or marginalize the hundreds of thousands of deaths and injuries from vaccines, and never issue world-wide alerts about how dangerous a vaccine may be. 

Neither organization speaks one word about the fact that any infant, toddler or school-age child who has received a vaccine based on an attenuated (weakened) virus, will be shedding the virus for the next 21 days and spreading the virus everywhere they go. 

Education or ignorance?

No Child Left Behind (NCLB) an education program titled to imply that all children would receive an education, is instead a systematic dumbing down of school children who are now being actively educated in globalism (the hive mentality) and who leave high school, if they make it that far, with what amounts to a fourth or fifth grade education comprised mostly of government approved information, most of which is quite useless.  As the movement to home schooling grows, so does the concern that these children, not exposed to the methodical nonsense in public schools, might pose a problem.  Generally far more advanced educationally than those in public schools, an effort had to be made to reframe the argument against home schooling.  Now we are hearing these children referred to as “strange, weird and creepy”.  It is apparent that these children, capable of critical and analytical thinking, who possess an education far beyond their public school counterparts, are to be viewed as ‘different”.  Not like us.  We need to be suspicious of them. 

Eugenics has taken many major steps forward.  No longer do the eugenicists have to expose their distaste for those they view as inferior nor do they need to engage in denigrating and eradicating races other than their own.  Gone are the days of forced sterilization and the ending of entire family lines based on some criteria that includes possibly any one who isn’t them.  They just have to vaccinate us.  They just have to wait for us to sit down and eat.  And with each generation of overly vaccinated, chemically toxic children, as a result of their diets and the vaccines who are then intentionally uneducated, we watch the slow decline of the population.   

Russell was almost prophetic in his assessment of the future of mankind at the hands of industrialized science.  For some reason the movie “Soylent Green” no longer seems quite so fictional or impossible.

___________________________________________________ 

CDC Reports Autism Prevalence Rate of 1 In 110 American Children, 1 In 70 Boys                        http://www.autismspeaks.org/donate/we_need_answers.php 

Deaths and Vaccinations                      http://www.whale.to/vaccines/deaths.html

Bertrand Russell/Scientific Outlook….Free download http://www.archive.org/details/scientificoutloo030217mbp 

Bertrand Russell/Impact of Science on Society …free e-book      http://www.e-booksdirectory.com/details.php?ebook=3015 

American Eugenics Society                          http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=American_Eugenics_Society

Are we killing our children?http://wellnessbycohen.com/documents/children.pdf

Ads by Google
FL Virtual Program School
FLVP provides textbooks, courses and materials at no cost to you.
www.K12.com

Posted via email from moneytalks's posterous

DailyTech - NASA Study Acknowledges Solar Cycle, Not Man, Responsible for Past Warming


Print

Listen to this article. Powered by Odiogo.com 148 comment(s) - last by pvandyke.. on Jun 16 at 5:52 PM
Recipient E-mail Please enter a valid E-mail addressPlease enter a valid E-mail address
Sender E-mail Please enter a valid E-mail addressPlease enter a valid E-mail address

Please input the letters/numbers that appear in the image below. (not case-sensitive)

Please enter the characters in the image below.

Protected by FormShield



Past studies have shown that sunspot numbers correspond to warming or cooling trends. The twentieth century has featured heightened activity, indicating a warming trend.  (Source: Wikimedia Commons)

Solar activity has shown a major spike in the twentieth century, corresponding to global warming. This cyclic variation was acknowledged by a recent NASA study, which reviewed a great deal of past climate data.  (Source: Wikimedia Commons)
Report indicates solar cycle has been impacting Earth since the Industrial Revolution

Some researchers believe that the solar cycle influences global climate changes.  They attribute recent warming trends to cyclic variation.  Skeptics, though, argue that there's little hard evidence of a solar hand in recent climate changes.

Now, a new research report from a surprising source may help to lay this skepticism to rest.  A study from

NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland looking at climate data over the past century has concluded that solar variation has made a significant impact on the Earth's climate.  The report concludes that evidence for climate changes based on solar radiation can be traced back as far as the Industrial Revolution.

Past research has shown that the sun goes through eleven year cycles.  At the cycle's peak, solar activity occurring near sunspots is particularly intense, basking the Earth in solar heat.  According to Robert Cahalan, a climatologist at the Goddard Space Flight Center, "Right now, we are in between major ice ages, in a period that has been called the Holocene."

Thomas Woods, solar scientist at the University of Colorado in Boulder concludes, "The fluctuations in the solar cycle impacts Earth's global temperature by about 0.1 degree Celsius, slightly hotter during solar maximum and cooler during solar minimum.  The sun is currently at its minimum, and the next solar maximum is expected in 2012."

According to the study, during periods of solar quiet, 1,361 watts per square meter of solar energy reaches Earth's outermost atmosphere.  Periods of more intense activity brought 1.4 watts per square meter (0.1 percent) more energy.

While the NASA study acknowledged the sun's influence on warming and cooling patterns, it then went badly off the tracks.  Ignoring its own evidence, it returned to an argument that man had replaced the sun as the cause current warming patterns.  Like many studies, this conclusion was based less on hard data and more on questionable correlations and inaccurate modeling techniques.

The inconvertible fact, here is that even NASA's own study acknowledges that solar variation has caused climate change in the past.  And even the study's members, mostly ardent supports of AGW theory, acknowledge that the sun may play a significant role in future climate changes.

Posted via email from moneytalks's posterous

Friday, April 1, 2011

Compressed Air Car

Compressed Air Car


                                                                                                                        April 2011
 

Hello:

     I first told you about this cool compressed air car in my August 2008 newsletter on the cars of tomorrow. Well... tomorrow is now today and I was just checking up on them to see if anything had come of it. I see so many "inventions" or claims of free energy and 99% of them turn out to be duds or outright scams and they never come to market.

     The Tesla Roadster company has since gone public and their stock is pretty much going sideways although a quick look today showed they were up 16% today. Not too bad! The Chevy Volt is in production and is currently the most fuel efficient production vehicle in the USA. I think they stole that on board battery charging idea from me though as that's the same exact power system I have been promoting since 2004 in my book Electricity - Make it, Don't Buy it.

The advantages I see for this technology include...

  • Low cost for the car and to run it
  • About 117 MPG
  • Low Emissions (or zero emissions)
  • No need for batteries - that's the biggest problem with electric vehicles

Here's a CNN video on the Compressed Air Car...

 

Here's a Youtube Video of the Compressed Air Car too...

 

Look for a compressed air car in your town in the near future! For more information, visit MDI Enterprises website!

Sincerely,
Bill Anderson

Posted via email from moneytalks's posterous

Jon Christian Ryter's Conservative World

Friday, April 01, 2011

Clash of the titans: Microsoft v. Google
as Google stifles Internet competition.

Antitrust suit filed by Microsoft.
As computer giant Microsoft, which launched its Bing search engine in June, 2009, filed an unfair trade complaint (i.e., antitrust action) against rival Google with the European Commission, its lawyers threw the weight and economic muscle of Microsoft behind an existing probe of whether or not Google is unfairly thwarting its global competitors in the online search market. In a press conference in Brussels on March 31, Microsoft General Council Brad Smith confirmed that Microsoft had filed an antitrust lawsuit against Google citing what he termed a growing concern at Microsoft over "...a broadening pattern of conduct aimed at stopping anyone else from creating a competitive alternative..." to Google. Smith said that Google, which owns YouTube, restricts competing search engines—including Bing—from properly accessing its video portal.

Microsoft has its fingers crossed that the European Union will not only sanction their antitrust argument but that they will convince FCC regulators in the United States to do the same. Microsoft's primary complaint against the search giant is centered on what Microsoft calls "Google's most egregious offense"—their indexing policies that prohibits competitors from indexing data from properties that Google controls. While Google touts is global mission to "organize the world's information and make it universally accessible and useful," Smith noted that while "...this is a laudable goal...it appears Google's practice is to prevent others from doing the same thing."

Al Verney, a Brussels-based spokesman for Google told the Associated Press that Google was not surprised that Microsoft was preparing a lawsuit since one of its subsidiaries was one of the original entities that filed the initial complaint being investigated by the European Commission. Verney said that Google was only too happy to explain to anyone how Google works and what they can, and won't, do. Smith, on the other hand noted that Microsoft has provided the Commission with several specific examples of what they term to be "anti-competitive practices by Google," involving some of Google's "pet projects."

A spokesman for the European Union's Competition Commissioner, Joaquin Almunia, said the European Commission had taken note of Microsoft's complaint against Google and would give Google the opportunity to response and tell its side of the story.

The European Union launched its investigation of Google in November, 2010 after it received several complaints from small Web companies that Google has a long history of burying certain websites in the search process as well as engaging in other forms of anti-competitive practices. Two of the companies which filed the initial complaint with the European Commission was an online shopping site, Ciao, which is owned by Microsoft's search engine, Bing, and United Kingdom-based Foundem which is a participant in a Microsoft-sponsored technology trade organization.

Microsoft's latest complaint is that Google blocked Microsoft's Windows Phones from "...operating properly with YouTube..." while offering better service to owners of its own Android phones and to iPhone (because Apple does not own a search engine).

Although Bing has partnered with third rival, Yahoo, neither Bing nor Yahoo have figured out how to close the search engine gap with Google, which controls 90% of the search market. It is unclear if Microsoft's EU antitrust action will find its way into the U.S. federal court anytime soon even though Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott is currently conducting an antitrust investigation of Google and several other States are "discussing" the same type of action.

Posted via email from moneytalks's posterous

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Safe nuclear does exist, and China is leading the way with thorium - Telegraph

Safe nuclear does exist, and China is leading the way with thorium

A few weeks before the tsunami struck Fukushima’s uranium reactors and shattered public faith in nuclear power, China revealed that it was launching a rival technology to build a safer, cleaner, and ultimately cheaper network of reactors based on thorium.

Thorium could be a much safer option for China which has been unsettled by the nuclear crisis in Japan where fears over radiation levels are rising
Thorium could be a much safer option for China which has been unsettled by the nuclear crisis in Japan where fears over radiation levels are rising Photo: AP

This passed unnoticed –except by a small of band of thorium enthusiasts – but it may mark the passage of strategic leadership in energy policy from an inert and status-quo West to a rising technological power willing to break the mould.

If China’s dash for thorium power succeeds, it will vastly alter the global energy landscape and may avert a calamitous conflict over resources as Asia’s industrial revolutions clash head-on with the West’s entrenched consumption.

China’s Academy of Sciences said it had chosen a “thorium-based molten salt reactor system”. The liquid fuel idea was pioneered by US physicists at Oak Ridge National Lab in the 1960s, but the US has long since dropped the ball. Further evidence of Barack `Obama’s “Sputnik moment”, you could say.

Chinese scientists claim that hazardous waste will be a thousand times less than with uranium. The system is inherently less prone to disaster.

“The reactor has an amazing safety feature,” said Kirk Sorensen, a former NASA engineer at Teledyne Brown and a thorium expert.

“If it begins to overheat, a little plug melts and the salts drain into a pan. There is no need for computers, or the sort of electrical pumps that were crippled by the tsunami. The reactor saves itself,” he said.

“They operate at atmospheric pressure so you don’t have the sort of hydrogen explosions we’ve seen in Japan. One of these reactors would have come through the tsunami just fine. There would have been no radiation release.”

Thorium is a silvery metal named after the Norse god of thunder. The metal has its own “issues” but no thorium reactor could easily spin out of control in the manner of Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, or now Fukushima.

Professor Robert Cywinksi from Huddersfield University said thorium must be bombarded with neutrons to drive the fission process. “There is no chain reaction. Fission dies the moment you switch off the photon beam. There are not enough neutrons for it continue of its own accord,” he said.

Dr Cywinski, who anchors a UK-wide thorium team, said the residual heat left behind in a crisis would be “orders of magnitude less” than in a uranium reactor.

The earth’s crust holds 80 years of uranium at expected usage rates, he said. Thorium is as common as lead. America has buried tons as a by-product of rare earth metals mining. Norway has so much that Oslo is planning a post-oil era where thorium might drive the country’s next great phase of wealth. Even Britain has seams in Wales and in the granite cliffs of Cornwall. Almost all the mineral is usable as fuel, compared to 0.7pc of uranium. There is enough to power civilization for thousands of years.

I write before knowing the outcome of the Fukushima drama, but as yet none of 15,000 deaths are linked to nuclear failure. Indeed, there has never been a verified death from nuclear power in the West in half a century. Perspective is in order.

We cannot avoid the fact that two to three billion extra people now expect – and will obtain – a western lifestyle. China alone plans to produce 100m cars and buses every year by 2020.

The International Atomic Energy Agency said the world currently has 442 nuclear reactors. They generate 372 gigawatts of power, providing 14pc of global electricity. Nuclear output must double over twenty years just to keep pace with the rise of the China and India.

If a string of countries cancel or cut back future reactors, let alone follow Germany’s Angela Merkel in shutting some down, they shift the strain onto gas, oil, and coal. Since the West is also cutting solar subsidies, they can hardly expect the solar industry to plug the gap.

BP’s disaster at Macondo should teach us not to expect too much from oil reserves deep below the oceans, beneath layers of blinding salt. Meanwhile, we rely uneasily on Wahabi repression to crush dissent in the Gulf and keep Arabian crude flowing our way. So where can we turn, unless we revert to coal and give up on the ice caps altogether? That would be courting fate.

US physicists in the late 1940s explored thorium fuel for power. It has a higher neutron yield than uranium, a better fission rating, longer fuel cycles, and does not require the extra cost of isotope separation.

The plans were shelved because thorium does not produce plutonium for bombs. As a happy bonus, it can burn up plutonium and toxic waste from old reactors, reducing radio-toxicity and acting as an eco-cleaner.

Dr Cywinski is developing an accelerator driven sub-critical reactor for thorium, a cutting-edge project worldwide. It needs to £300m of public money for the next phase, and £1.5bn of commercial investment to produce the first working plant. Thereafter, economies of scale kick in fast. The idea is to make pint-size 600MW reactors.

Yet any hope of state support seems to have died with the Coalition budget cuts, and with it hopes that Britain could take a lead in the energy revolution. It is understandable, of course. Funds are scarce. The UK has already put its efforts into the next generation of uranium reactors. Yet critics say vested interests with sunk costs in uranium technology succeeded in chilling enthusiasm.

The same happened a decade ago to a parallel project by Nobel laureate Carlo Rubbia at CERN (European Organization for Nuclear Research). France’s nuclear industry killed proposals for funding from Brussels, though a French group is now working on thorium in Grenoble.

Norway’s Aker Solution has bought Professor Rubbia’s patent. It had hoped to build the first sub-critical reactor in the UK, but seems to be giving up on Britain and locking up a deal to build it in China instead, where minds and wallets are more open.

So the Chinese will soon lead on this thorium technology as well as molten-salts. Good luck to them. They are doing Mankind a favour. We may get through the century without tearing each other apart over scarce energy and wrecking the planet.

This is my last column for a while. I am withdrawing to the Mayan uplands.

Posted via email from moneytalks's posterous