Use our Private Lenders Money (your town)
Date: 2011-07-17, 8:22PM EDT
Reply to: your anonymous craigslist address will appear here
We have a rolodex of private lenders who are lending money for real estate deals.
Do you have a deal that makes sense but needs funding?We may be able to help.
Private lenders are more flexible than banks or mortgage brokers.
Send us your deals!
Thursday, July 21, 2011
craigslist | manage posting
Wednesday, July 20, 2011
131 Children Vaccinated At Gunpoint in Malawi | Health Freedom Alliance
131 Children Vaccinated At Gunpoint in Malawi
Submitted by Lois Rain on July 18, 2011 – 11:45 pm5 Comments
The Gates Foundation has long been in an aggressive effort to vaccinate the world and often targets poor Africans. The Gates’ web site showcases Melinda Gates applauding Malawi for enforcing vaccine programs with its helpful “health surveillance assistants.” She calls Malawi one of the few countries “on track to reach the UN Millennium Development Goal.” And who are those assistants meeting the goal? Hyper-vigilant medics with help from police.
Bill Gates calls the vaccine-autism link “an absolute lie” and in a February CNN interview said, “the people who go and engage in those anti-vaccine efforts – you know, they, they kill children.” But as we can see from the recent actions from governments who partner with his foundation to forcefully implement vaccine programs, it could very well be the other way around.
Malawi Voice recently reported that about 131 children from Nsanje were vaccinated with anti-measles at gunpoint last week. They had fled from previous vaccine mandates into nearby towns, but after officials learned they had returned, medics along with police escorts tracked the children and forced them to vaccinate.
The children belonged to Zion and Atumwi Churches and parents took them into Mozambique to hide from officials with vaccines. It is unclear if those churches prohibit the use of vaccines, but a Malawi man with a Seventh Day Apostolic faith found himself sentenced to two year’s imprisonment for refusing to let his three children receive the measles vaccine. He did not believe in going to doctors or receiving vaccinations. Police said that they believed one of his children died from measles and he was charged for “endangering life by failing to supply necessities of life to a person under one’s care without lawful excuse.” According to a penal code. He pleaded for a light sentence because he cares for orphans, but the charges stand.
The Gates have repeatedly emphasized their goal to vaccinate every child on earth and it is clear that children and parents have no say in the matter. These families may have fled the vaccinations because of information, witnessing its harmful effects in others, religious beliefs, or hunches. Maybe they know it’s Bad Medicine or a modern version of smallpox blankets. A damaging, ineffective toxic cocktail. Whatever the case, they had no choice. The Gates banner says “Human Rights! We come generously bearing good gifts of health and peace,” take the gifts or else…get shot?
It is also clear that the Gates applaud and support this type of force. Either way, the children get shot.
Every month,11,000(!) of these health surveillance assistants spend three weeks providing health care (vaccinations) and information and one week in the rural health clinics. “And they also make sure the vaccinations happen: not just at the village level, but all the way back through the system.” Melinda Gates said. [emphasis added]
That they do, with guns and needles aimed and loaded.
~Health Freedoms
Sources:
http://www.faceofmalawi.com/2011/07/131-children-vaccinated-at-gunpoint-in-ma...
http://www.malawivoice.com/latest-news/131-children-vaccinated-at-gunpoint-in...
http://edition.cnn.com/2011/HEALTH/02/03/gupta.gates.vaccines.world.health/
http://www.gatesfoundation.org/maternalnewbornandchildhealth/Pages/melinda-fr...
Sunday, July 17, 2011
Florida foreclosure investigators say they were forced to resign - The Washington Post
Florida foreclosure investigators say they were forced to resign
Theresa Edwards and June Clarkson had headed up investigations on behalf of the Florida attorney general’s office for more than a year into the fraudulent foreclosure practices that had become rampant in the Sunshine State. They issued subpoenas and conducted scores of interviews, building a litany of cases that documented the most egregious abuses.
That is, until the Friday afternoon in May when they were called into a supervisor’s office and forced to resign abruptly and without explanation.
“It just came out of nowhere,” said Edwards, who had worked in the attorney general’s economic crimes section for more than three years. “We were completely stunned.”
Less than a month before they were forced out, a supervisor cited their work as “instrumental in triggering a nationwide review of such practices.” Now, Edwards is convinced their sudden dismissals will have “a chilling effect” on those probes into the shoddy foreclosure practices that caused national outrage when they made headlines last fall.
Although similar abuses have occurred throughout the country, they have been particularly rampant in Florida, which was ground zero for the housing bust and is home to a collection of large law firms that were hired by the financial industry to relentlessly churn out foreclosures in recent years. That made the investigations headed by Edwards and Clarkson among the earliest and most closely watched by officials across the country.
A spokeswoman for Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi declined to comment on what she cited as internal personnel matters but said in an e-mail that the foreclosure investigations remain a top priority.
Before the uproar last fall, Edwards and Clarkson were already investigating the problems plaguing foreclosure filings in the state. Working under then-attorney general Bill McCollum, they created a 98-page presentation entitled “Unfair, Deceptive and Unconscionable Acts in Foreclosure Cases,” which detailed such far-ranging problems as fake and forged affidavits and falsified mortgage ownership records.
Their inquiry led them to focus on “foreclosure mill” law firms that were filing foreclosures for their clients at lightning speed, as well as to the practices of other companies in the mortgage industry. It also led to calls from other attorneys general offices across the country that were beginning to scrutinize similar problems.
“We were farther along in our investigation because we had dug a little deeper than anybody else,” Edwards said. “We kept opening up more and more investigations, more and more cases.”
Their work won them accolades. In the evaluation provided by Edwards, a supervisor wrote that the pair had “achieved what is believed to be the first settlement in the United States relating to law firm foreclosure mills” — a multimillion-dollar settlement a month earlier with a Fort Lauderdale firm.
Despite that praise, Edwards and Clarkson said in separate interviews that they sensed a change when Bondi took office in January. Almost immediately, they said, supervisors began to question their findings and demand details about how they were gathering information.
Florida foreclosure investigators say they were forced to resign - The Washington Post
Florida foreclosure investigators say they were forced to resign
Theresa Edwards and June Clarkson had headed up investigations on behalf of the Florida attorney general’s office for more than a year into the fraudulent foreclosure practices that had become rampant in the Sunshine State. They issued subpoenas and conducted scores of interviews, building a litany of cases that documented the most egregious abuses.
That is, until the Friday afternoon in May when they were called into a supervisor’s office and forced to resign abruptly and without explanation.
“It just came out of nowhere,” said Edwards, who had worked in the attorney general’s economic crimes section for more than three years. “We were completely stunned.”
Less than a month before they were forced out, a supervisor cited their work as “instrumental in triggering a nationwide review of such practices.” Now, Edwards is convinced their sudden dismissals will have “a chilling effect” on those probes into the shoddy foreclosure practices that caused national outrage when they made headlines last fall.
Although similar abuses have occurred throughout the country, they have been particularly rampant in Florida, which was ground zero for the housing bust and is home to a collection of large law firms that were hired by the financial industry to relentlessly churn out foreclosures in recent years. That made the investigations headed by Edwards and Clarkson among the earliest and most closely watched by officials across the country.
A spokeswoman for Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi declined to comment on what she cited as internal personnel matters but said in an e-mail that the foreclosure investigations remain a top priority.
Before the uproar last fall, Edwards and Clarkson were already investigating the problems plaguing foreclosure filings in the state. Working under then-attorney general Bill McCollum, they created a 98-page presentation entitled “Unfair, Deceptive and Unconscionable Acts in Foreclosure Cases,” which detailed such far-ranging problems as fake and forged affidavits and falsified mortgage ownership records.
Their inquiry led them to focus on “foreclosure mill” law firms that were filing foreclosures for their clients at lightning speed, as well as to the practices of other companies in the mortgage industry. It also led to calls from other attorneys general offices across the country that were beginning to scrutinize similar problems.
“We were farther along in our investigation because we had dug a little deeper than anybody else,” Edwards said. “We kept opening up more and more investigations, more and more cases.”
Their work won them accolades. In the evaluation provided by Edwards, a supervisor wrote that the pair had “achieved what is believed to be the first settlement in the United States relating to law firm foreclosure mills” — a multimillion-dollar settlement a month earlier with a Fort Lauderdale firm.
Despite that praise, Edwards and Clarkson said in separate interviews that they sensed a change when Bondi took office in January. Almost immediately, they said, supervisors began to question their findings and demand details about how they were gathering information.
Thursday, July 14, 2011
Nanotechnology: Tracking food from farm to fork…and you right along with it « The PPJ Gazette
Nanotechnology: Tracking food from farm to fork…and you right along with it
July 12, 2011 by ppjg
Marti Oakley (c)copyright 2011 All Rights Reserved
______________________________________________
Noting “certain food-related ailments” this committee failed to ask the most obvious and relevant question:
If these ailments are a result of the food we are eating…..what is the underlying problem with the food? And why would finding a remedy for this increase in possibly deadly ailments include further contamination and adulteration of the food supply with nano-chips?
_______________________________________________
I had come across an article in the Dairy Reporter last year, about the coming plans to insert nano-technology into food. In the article from DR: Nanotechnology in food: What’s the big idea? By Caroline Scott-Thomas, 26-Jul-2010 this observation was made:
“At IFT’s nanoscience conference last week, major industry players discussed how to avoid a rerun of the GMO debacle with consumers – with some saying that one solution could be to say nothing about introducing nanotechnology in foods and to do it anyway.”
We all have enough experience with today’s bio-pirates who are openly colluding with the USDA, FDA and anyone else in government, like “Dirty Harry” Reid NV (D), who single-handedly and unanimously cast the one vote needed to pass the fake food safety bill, to know that food safety and longer shelf life is most likely not what this technology is actually intended to do. As it is, most products on the shelves of stores now are so chemically laden and contain so much gmo that I doubt spoilage is an option. After all….can chemicals, pesticides and herbicides actually rot?
Most of what sits in our stores is not really food as we have known it. It is a stew of sorts; chemicals, additives, flavorings, colorings, enhancers, preservatives, aspartame, neotame, and stuff we can’t even identify along with residual hormones, vaccines, antibiotics, herbicides and pesticides. It has been irradiated, sprayed with viruses and now covered in ammonia. Reading any label for content makes one think you would be just as well off if you drank floor cleaner and it most likely might be a lot tastier although just as empty of nutrition.
We also know, from experience, that no matter what kind of song and dance emanates from one of these foreign corporations (FAO/WHO) and Big Ag and the Bio-pirates that nothing is in the works that will not have an adverse application of some kind, which is most likely the true intent. Of course my immediate reaction is first and foremost: What are these foreign corporations doing setting “standards in technology” (profit and control) that are to be foisted on the US? But ….I digress…. that’s a story for another day.
The potential for abuse of this technology being used adversely is huge.
Big AG and the bio-pirates make no bones about their intent to track food from field to fork and at every step of the process in between which is why it is so imperative that they seize control of production and supply. It is really hard to control the food supply when you have not yet been able to lay claim to all of it no matter how cooperative “Dirty Harry” and his merry band of corporate hiney huggers were or are.
In this report: FAO/WHO Expert meeting on the application of nanotechnologies in the food and agriculture sectors: potential food safety implications:
The industry is, therefore, always seeking new technologies to offer products with improved tastes, flavours, textures, longer shelf-life, and better safety and traceability.
- to address certain food-related ailments, such as obesity, high blood pressure, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, digestive disorders, certain types of cancer (e.g. bowel cancer) and food allergies
________
What the report fails to address or even mention is that every medical disorder listed has been greatly exacerbated and occurs at an accelerated rate due to the chronic contamination and adulteration of food supplies with chemical, pharmaceutical and foreign toxins. Noting “certain food-related ailments” this committee failed to ask the most obvious and relevant question:
If these ailments are a result of the food we are eating…..what is the underlying problem with the food? And why would finding a remedy for this increase in possibly deadly ailments include further contamination and adulteration of the food supply with nano-chips?
I doubt any reasonable person would conclude that the underlying problem was a lack of RFID nano-chips, or a lack of organic nano’s, in the food supply. Or that there was any personal value in having your medication monitored by a satellite in the sky, at least for the reasons it would be done . This is an invasion of privacy.
According to this report, this technology will be applied to animal feeds and water, right along with commercially available foods. This way, no matter what you eat, you will be ingesting numerous versions of nanochips of one kind or another. The committee does ponder the question as to whether an accumulation of nano’s could cause further health problems, possibly creating peripheral problems from accumulation. Also, the committee is concerned about the possibility of the chips to escape the GI track and leech out into other internal organs.
Nano-chips will be used to supposedly make food taste more like food by enhancing the flavor and texture. Here again the obvious is avoided. Natural food left uncontaminated by toxins, chemicals, pharmaceuticals, and whatever else could be thrown in, tends to taste……like food. You don’t need enhancers, or nanoparticles to stimulate your taste buds to fool your brain into thinking you actually just ate something nutritious and tasty.
Nanochips inserted as RFID is the last nail in the coffin of food freedom. Having reduced the food supply and the available products to a substance that has to be enhanced or that has to be chemically pumped up to make you think it might really be food, is the problem. And, it is an intentionally created system meant to eventually accommodate the insertion of RFID nanochips to detect not only what you are eating, but to extend surveillance of the individual. Having reduced the commercial food supply to dangerously toxic concoctions, the report states, the intention and subsequent use of nanochips in food and pharmaceuticals will be used to monitor:
- the application of nanotechnologies in all aspects of the primary production of foods of plant and animal origin;
- the application of nanotechnologies in food processing, packaging and distribution;
- the use of nanodiagnostic tools for detection and monitoring in food and agricultural production.
- Nanotechnologies applied in the environment were also included if there was a potential direct impact on food safety through the environment to the food chain.
- The Expert Meeting was asked not to cover occupational health matters surrounding the use and application of nanotechnologies in the food and agriculture sector
______________________
RFID Nano’s are so small that once ingested they can circulate undetected by the immune system. Kind of like an on-board gps for humans or anything else for that matter.
The red flags should be flying right about now. Here is the plan for field to fork, from fork to human monitoring and individual surveillance. While I would truly like to think that the intentions of this committee of experts was to protect the food supply from further and unnecessary contamination, it is apparent the focus was instead, planning the future use of nanotechnology to track and control food production and its consumption. While many may argue this will help with traceability, it is a subterfuge meant to divert from the crux of the issue.
While some of what this committee addressed was the current use of organic nano technology which is said to be water soluble and which allows for greater absorption of nutrients, currently used in vitamins and supplements to some degree, and in some readily available food products, it is obvious the intent is to eventually track and control through nano-enabled RFID surveillance, the production and supply of food. Organic nano technology and RFID nano technology are two divergent aspects that are intentionally discussed as though they are one and the same. They are not.
Whatever happened to just plain food?
________________________________________
SOURCE
http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241563932_eng.pdf
Mother 'with attitude' arrested after refusing TSA pat-down of daughter | Mail Online
Mother 'with attitude' arrested after refusing TSA pat-down of daughter
Last updated at 2:56 PM on 13th July 2011
A mother has been arrested after refusing to let her child be searched by a TSA agent.
Charged: Andrea Fornella Abbott was arrested after refusing to let her child have a TSA pat-down
Andrea Fornella Abbott, 41, was arrested at Nashville International Airport on Saturday after telling agents she did not want her daughter to be 'touched inappropriately' or have her 'crotch grabbed,' according to a police report.
Mrs Abbott acted 'belligerent and verbally abusive to staff', yelling and swearing at them, according to the report.
Police said after the woman refused to calm down she was arrested and charged with disorderly conduct.
Speaking to police, airport officer Sabrina Birge said:'[Abbott] told me in a very stern voice with quite a bit of attitude that they were not going through that X-ray.'
The officer then told Mrs Abbott: 'No, it’s not an X-ray,' before adding, 'It is 10,000 times safer than your cell phone and uses the same type of radio waves as a sonogram.'
Mrs Abbott then reportedly replied: 'I still don’t want someone to see our bodies naked.'
Change: Airport security workers will now make repeated attempts to screen young children without resorting to invasive pat-downs
Mrs Abbott was also prevented from taking a video of the incident on her mobile phone.
The news comes as the TSA finally changed its policy on patting down young children at airports this month.
Airport security workers will now make repeated attempts to screen young children without resorting to invasive pat-downs.
The agency is working to put that change in place around the country, and it should reduce, but not eliminate, pat-downs for children.
The move comes after public outrage in April over a video of six-year-old Anna Drexel, who was patted down at New Orleans airport.
via dailymail.co.uk
Sunday, July 10, 2011
USDA Owns ‘Organic’ Name! Stifles Farmers Markets | Health Freedom Alliance
USDA Owns ‘Organic’ Name! Stifles Farmers Markets
Submitted by Lois Rain on July 8, 2011 – 6:08 pmNo Comment
An Arizona farmer shares what he has to do to sell his organic goods at a farmers market.
The USDA claims in writing that they own the “organic” name. Farmers have to use “homegrown” instead to promote their organic goods at local markets.
A 10-page agreement must be filled out completely and submitted prior to booth rental. The agreement must include all permits, certifications, a “crop plan” and a “proposed farm visit schedule.” It has to include a map of the farm location with cross streets, land marks, and mile posts for accurate location.
Most of us want some kind of process to make sure we’re buying organic, but what these farmers have to do to sell a few carrots is almost too much to bear. It’s a wonder they even bother anymore.
The process effects the high costs of true organic food, yet the USDA does not crack down on typical grocery goods bearing the “organic” name without proof. Nor do they regulate other English speaking countries stealing the “organic” name.
The video shows how the markets are centrally planned and politically controlled so that local farmers are tracked and everyone get’s their cut.
Political control Freaks take over Farmers Market
Thursday, July 7, 2011
Global warming or new ice age: YOU'RE paying for our politicians' hysteria | Mail Online
Global warming? A new ice age? The only certainty is that YOU'RE paying for the hysteria of our politicians
Last updated at 10:01 AM on 6th July 2011
Who would possibly have thought it? The latest news is that the world may be threatened by a sharp drop in temperatures, possibly so severe that it could herald a new mini ice age.
And one reason being put forward for this is that all the pollution being chucked out by thousands of coal-fired power stations may be blocking the sun's heat from the Earth.
Dr Robert Kaufman of Boston University blamed China this week. 'During the Chinese economic expansion there was a huge increase in sulphur emissions,' he said. And this was the cause of global cooling.
Ice age on its way? The latest news is that we may be threatened by a sharp drop in temperature
But hang on a moment. Aren't these new climate scaremongers the very same people who only a few years back were telling us that the planet was in danger of being fried to a crisp by runaway global warming?
And wasn't it on their say so that the world's politicians, led by our own here in Britain, were committing us to spending hundreds of billions of pounds to save the planet from the catastrophic warming caused by those same evil power stations?
The question this extraordinary turn of events raises is whether any of these supposed experts actually have the faintest idea what they are talking about.
But perhaps the most bizarre thing about this latest twist in the ongoing climate scare story is the way it takes us precisely back to where it all started 40 years ago.
All of us today have become so accustomed to the notion of global warming that it is hard to believe that in the Seventies, U.S. scientists began to warn us the world was heading for a cooling so severe it might even herald a new ice age.
Make your minds up: For years, scientists were telling us about global warming
This was because for 30 years, after a sharp rise earlier in the 20th century, global temperatures had markedly dropped.
And the cause of this cooling, it was argued by the U.S. scientists, led by climatologists Stephen Schneider and James Hansen, was all the sulphur dioxide and other particulates being chucked out by burning fossil fuels — notably those from coal-fired power stations.
Fifteen years later, the very same scientists were at the forefront of the great panic over global warming.
Schneider, who became Professor of environmental biology and global change at Stanford University, argued this time that the damage was being done not by soot and sulphur preventing the sun's heat reaching the earth, but by carbon dioxide and other 'greenhouse gases', which were trapping heat.
It was men such as Schneider and Hansen who, at the end of the Eighties, so terrified the politicians with their theory that CO2 equalled global warming that, within a few years, the world's leaders were gathering in vast conferences in Rio and Kyoto to sign treaties that committed us to massive cuts in the CO2 emissions on which the global economy depended.
For a while it seemed that the theory they had programmed into dozens of computer models was being confirmed by the evidence. CO2 levels continued to rise and temperatures appeared to follow suit.
But then, more recently, it became obvious that something had gone seriously awry with the theory.
Sure, CO2 in the atmosphere was still continuing to rise. But no longer were temperatures rising in synch, as the computer models predicted they should.
The basic theory was that as CO2 levels go up, the average temperatures go up too
By 2007, as temperatures temporarily plummeted by as much as their entire net rise in the 20th century, experts were beginning to question the global warming orthodoxy.
An increasing number of breakaway climatologists were saying the cause of that late 20th century rise in temperatures might not be CO2 at all.
Perhaps, they suggested, there were other factors responsible for shaping the earth's climate — such as fluctuations in radiation from the sun and shifts in the world's major ocean currents.
So, some of those on the warm-ist side of the argument came up with a compromise theory.
Maybe, they agreed, the world was now heading for a period of cooling, but the effect of these natural factors was only to 'mask the underlying warming trend'.
Within a decade or two, the warming produced by man-made CO2 would come back worse than ever.
Britain is not alone in enduring three of its coldest winters for decades in the last few years
In the past few years, as much of the world has endured three of its coldest winters for decades, it has become almost comical to see how, whatever our weather does to us, the warm-ists still manage to cling on to their pet theory.
Whatever happens now, whether it is hot or cold, whether we get heatwaves or record snowfalls, floods or droughts, sooner or later we hear those familiar little voices piping up to tell us that the blame for all these 'extreme weather events' still lies on 'disruption' to the climate caused by the sinful activities of mankind.
They're all at it — from the environmental activists of Greenpeace, the WWF and their allies in the BBC and the Met Office, to those thousands of scientists across the world who have received billions in funding from governments investing in climate change research and prevention — all still battling to keep in being the greatest scare story in the history of the world.
The truth is that it becomes ever more obvious that none of them really has a clue as to what is responsible for the changes in our climate. They can't even tell us what global temperatures will be next month or next year, let alone what they will be in 100 years' time, as they like to pretend their computer models can predict. But the really terrifying thing about all this is that our politicians have become so locked into the scare story that there is not yet the slightest sign they are prepared to notice the reality now crowding in on them on every side — that global warming is by no means a certainty.
Three years ago, when the hysteria over global warming was still at its height, our own British politicians voted almost unanimously for the Climate Change Act committing us, uniquely in the world, to cut our CO2 emissions by 80 per cent within 40 years.
Even on the Government's own figures, showing that this will cost us up to £18 billion every year until 2050, it is by far the most expensive law ever passed by Parliament.
We are also committed to meet an EU target that, within a mere nine years, we must generate a third of our electricity from 'renewables' — mainly by spending £200 billion on building thousands more windmills so useless that, last weekend, they could produce only half a per cent of the power we actually needed.
As our politicians continually impose on us ever higher taxes and other costs supposedly in the cause of 'fighting climate change' — costs that have already helped to increase every family's energy bills by an average £200 a year — they have been carried away by a collective fantasy that has no parallel in history.
And all this is happening in the name of a theory so fraudulent that the same people who told us the world is about to fry unless we close down all those power stations are now telling us the same power stations may be heading us into a new ice age.
Truly, the lunatics have taken over the asylum. And short of some massive injection of common sense from the British people, it seems the rest of us are condemned to live in it.
via dailymail.co.uk
Monday, July 4, 2011
Shivering Britain: Little Ice Age could be on its way | Mail Online
Is Britain about to be plunged into a Little Ice Age?
Last updated at 8:15 AM on 4th July 2011
Scientists think Britain and Europe could be in for a chilly few years predicting a 'Little Ice Age' could be on its way in just a few decades time.
Average temperatures in Britain could fall by two degrees centigrade, according to the study led by Mike Lockwood, professor of space environment physics at Reading University, because of a drop in the amount of sunspot activity.
Sunspots are darker patches seen in the sun's surface which are caused by small areas of magnetic activity which disrupts the normal flow of intensely heated gases.
Scientists have discovered that a drop in sunspots, pictured in black could block winds that can keep Europe from excessive cold in winter
But last year, Professor Lockwood discovered that a drop in sunspots could block winds that can keep Europe from excessive cold in winter, according to the Daily Telegraph.
Professor Lockwood's team looked at the sun's activity of the past 9,300 years using Met Office data.
His findings, published by the Institute of Physics, (IoP) showed that in the next 50 years there is a one in 10 chance of the sun returning to conditions seen between 1645 and 1715 when the River Thames in London regularly froze over, as did the Baltic Sea.
Known as the Maunder Minimum during these years astronomers could not see any sunspots and Europe endured unusually harsh winters which came to be known as the Little Ice Age.
A scene from the 2004 film The Day After Tomorrow where temperatures dropped freezing New York
Professor Lockwood's findings could mean the average winter temperature could drop below 2.5C, compared to the average British winter now of 5C, the newspaper reported.
In June, three different studies all concluded that sunspot activity looks set to decline over the next 10 years.
Experts said the next upswing in sunspot activity, which follows an 11-year cycle, will not be as strong as normal - or might not even happen at all.
The findings were presented at a meeting of the American Astronomical Society's solar physics division.
They said a decrease in global warming might result in the years after 2020, the approximate time when sunspots are expected to disappear for years, maybe even decades.
Snowy weather brings a Scottish road to a standstill last year. Scientists say the average winter temperature could drop below 2.5C, compared to the average British winter now of 5C
via dailymail.co.uk
Sunday, July 3, 2011
The New Era of “All Natural” False Flag Disasters | Pakalert Press
by Zen Gardner
On 9/11 the premise for explaining the dramatic ritual that unfolded before the world was that steel structures can collapse into dust from jet fuel fires. Never before has a steel structure collapsed from any kind of fire nor has one since, yet that day 3 huge buildings dropped like rocks into their own footprints–one, building 7 that didn’t come down till the afternoon, did it even without jet fuel. No problem. Buildings fall from fire. We get it.
And the world fell for it.
Enter the Nuclear Factor
-
-
Nuclear reactors have never before been destroyed or triggered into a mega crisis by floods. Now we have several incidents under way in Japan, with a threat to two more in Nebraska right on their heels.
Easier to swallow now, isn’t it? That’s how you do it–set a spectacular precedent, then run with it.
BTW, you say the Tsunami was an exception? Why was their back up generator put in the basement? Why are there so many questions surrounding faulty construction, strange equipment malfunctions and explosions at the reactors?
Yet the world believes it was “all natural”…despite the strangeness, nonsequiturs and news blackout.
Open the Spigot
No go on to explain why the US Army Corps of Engineers and all their resources deliberately flood massive areas near these Nebraska nuclear facilities, but don’t have enough foresight to protect one simple compound housing a massive nuclear arsenal?
Oh, they put up a rubber berm balloon, but oops, there was an “accident”.
And the world swallows it again. After all, floods trigger reactors, we get it.
Then Why Not Fires, Too?
Now let’s go to Los Alamos. The area has been hit by wildfires before, yet they’ve kept the largest stockpile of nukes in the country sitting next to the rest of their nuclear research facilities. And in what? Frikking canvas buildings!
Don’t worry, it’s a “natural disaster”. Just like the others. Nothing to wonder about, back to sleep people.
Ooops…Might Have An Accident Here…..
This is a perfect illustration. The PTBs don’t even give things a chance of not happening. They don’t even take the chance that the mouse won’t take the cheese—they’ll lower him on to the trap! Same with today’s world. Put reactors in the way of hazards, irradiate people for “safety”, produce junk food, bad drugs, GMO crops and poison the air and water and what do you know? Sick and dying people. They’ll say it was just an accident once found out, always do.
We know better.
Anything make sense to you?
Well, we don’t find out the insanity of how they’ve laid things out just ripe for disaster until something like this happens, then it’s too late. The government also claimed they had no idea airplanes could be used as weapons to hit the twin towers and the other targets. Right.
But that small stuff’s just buffering. You have to protect your big lie with lots of smaller ones. The 9/11 discussion was quickly diverted to “Who did this to us?”
That kerosene can’t melt steel, never mind pulverize thousands of tons of concrete, fixtures and office furniture, and then vaporize thousands of people scattering microscopic bone fragments several blocks away isn’t important. We saw those planes and THEY did it! Classic.
And Now “The Natural Way”
They’ve done it before and they know they can do it again. All you need is a BIG ENOUGH LIE. Fukushima was BIG….VERY big. It still doesn’t add up that buildings were barely damaged in the region yet a tsunami of unprecedented magnitude could be generated like that.
Check this story from an Israeli newspaper. Dead giveaway of this natural disaster conditioning.
Los Alamos National Laboratory is indelibly etched in historical memory as the hatching site of the Manhattan Project, the effort which created the first atomic bomb. The world’s largest nuclear weapons arsenal is still located there. Now a raging wildfire has forced the evacuation of the surrounding town of Los Alamos (population 12,000)..
Given the recent Japanese disaster at Fukushima, the fear of course is that a natural disaster can morph into a nuclear one.Source
Of course, the instilled fear and assumption this is “all natural” morphing now. Brainwash, rinse, repeat.
A Decades Old Recipe for Disaster
Not only are reactors perched in precarious geological zones, many of them are running over capacity, and are overdue for maintenance and/or were scheduled to have been replaced years ago. Talk about a recipe for disaster.
What were they thinking? Or were they.
This from AP on June 27:
More than 90 of the nation’s 104 operating reactors have been allowed to run at higher power levels for many years, raising the radiation risk in a major accident. In an ongoing investigative series, the AP has reported that aging plants, their lives extended by industry and regulators, are prone to breakdowns that could lead to accidents.
And because the federal government has failed to find a location for permanent storage of spent fuel, thousands of tons of highly radioactive used reactor rods are kept in pools onsite and more is stored there all the time.
Who Needs A Nuclear Attack?
Looks like this country was mined for disaster 50 years ago. All it took was a Fukushima to start the ball rolling, giving the impression “natural events” are triggering these nuclear disasters. Suddenly, we have a flood threatening two reactors in the midwest, and a massive fire threatening a seemingly stacked nuclear dump in Los Alamos.
Sorry, this is all too pat.
Conclusion
The Japan earthquake leading to a nuclear emergency gives a perfect cover to the general populace. The fact that suddenly a similar submerging of pumps and fuel rod holding tanks happens right in its wake therefore is digestible to most. Same with the fire. They’re jamming this false conditioning into our heads.
A lot of us were thinking they might try a mini-nuke in a US or European city as the next false flag. Looks like the Japan experiment was successful so they’ve utilized their geoengineering technology to continue the job, using their atmospheric heaters to trigger earthquakes and steer violent weather into volatile areas.
And now you don’t even need terrorists to blame–you can blame nature. Apparently the PTBs think they’ve got a pretty good grip on her.
We’ll see about that.
Made you laugh, didn’t it?! Good, we need to relax, this stuff can get overwhelming.
But don’t worry, they can’t win, just make a mess of things for awhile until the new wave of consciousness takes over.
And oh how they’re afraid of it!
Keep raising your consciousness levels and that of those around you – it’s working!
Love, Zen
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
42
Comments